<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People who Save are Frickin&#8217; Idiots!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fubarrio.com/2007/07/people-who-save-are-frickin-idiots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fubarrio.com/2007/07/people-who-save-are-frickin-idiots/</link>
	<description>Dispensing Unwanted Advice since 2006</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 06:20:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fuBarrio</title>
		<link>http://www.fubarrio.com/2007/07/people-who-save-are-frickin-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>fuBarrio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fubarrio.com/?p=180#comment-130</guid>
		<description>oh yeah...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i forgot to mention this, but the btu to btu equivalent of nat gas to crude oil right now is about 2X what it &quot;should&quot; be if the two commodities were freely convertible across all uses, consumer and industrial.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They aren&#039;t.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are lots of reasons that crude trades at higher than the 6x (rough) equiv of what a strict btu to btu conversion should dictate.  However, when it gets this extreme, it *can* signal the potential for there to be pressure on one commodity or the other (nat gas up or crude oil down) in the intermediate term.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;my (big oil) energy play has been COP (Conoco Philips) for years and has a pretty healthy mix of both (nat gas and crude) however, it also has a geopolitical risk profile that gives me ulcers when the position is too big -- so i&#039;m forced to keep it quite small.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;fB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh yeah&#8230;</p>
<p>i forgot to mention this, but the btu to btu equivalent of nat gas to crude oil right now is about 2X what it &#8220;should&#8221; be if the two commodities were freely convertible across all uses, consumer and industrial.  </p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>There are lots of reasons that crude trades at higher than the 6x (rough) equiv of what a strict btu to btu conversion should dictate.  However, when it gets this extreme, it *can* signal the potential for there to be pressure on one commodity or the other (nat gas up or crude oil down) in the intermediate term.</p>
<p>my (big oil) energy play has been COP (Conoco Philips) for years and has a pretty healthy mix of both (nat gas and crude) however, it also has a geopolitical risk profile that gives me ulcers when the position is too big &#8212; so i&#8217;m forced to keep it quite small.</p>
<p>fB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

